User talk:Sacha

• Hey, I saw you left notes on several pages (in this case stating that you couldn't find anything to show that a certain state party existed). It might be a good idea to "sign" these "notes" so its easier to tell who(and when) left them. its easy just type --~~~~ at the end of the note! Hope this helps :D -- Itspara^Talk! _edits 23:08, 30 August 2012 (EDT)
• On Pirate National Committee (PNC)/Constitution you made an alteration. When was, "#A yearly convention shall be held for the purposes of party elections at a date specified in the bylaws," approved to be added or was it supposed to be there but was missed? Otherwise, the Constitution shouldn't be treated as a working document, as this is a wiki and used for reference. Use the discussion tab or your user page to save your proposals. QuazarGuy (talk) 04:47, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
• Idk if I am doing this right? I was asked to go through the log and make all amendment changes to the constitution. That was an amendment that was made in the PNC meeting I can go ahead and link you to the exact date. - Sacha
  • Actually, that's not a bad idea. From now on, we should link to the source of any changes in such kinds of documents, at least as the reason for the change so the history can be logged more easily. QuazarGuy (talk) 03:33, 18 September 2012 (EDT)
  • http://www.pirate-party.us/wiki/PNC_8/15/12
    • I'll continue to do this in the future -Sacha
• User:Sacha#Aesthetic_changes I bolded them a long time ago when Washington was the only active one on the wiki and Nevada and Texas had just started sections. Eventually, everything would've ended up bold, but you can unbold them if you like. QuazarGuy (talk) 04:10, 23 September 2012 (EDT)